Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Seth McKee
IFP petition
Questions presented
-
Whether a criminal prosecution may proceed when the allegations underlying that prosecution originate in a judicial proceeding in which jurisdiction was never lawfully established.
-
Whether exhaustion of state remedies is ex cused where court officials prevented Petitioner from maintaining a state extraordinary-writ proceeding necessary to obtain review of the jurisdictional defect.
-
Whether abstention doctrines such as Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), apply where the predicate proceeding never acquired jurisdiction in the first instance.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Seth McKee
For respondent
Jacqueline Humphrey Chafin Sullivan
Oklahoma Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Sep 03 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Aug 04 2026Waiver of right of respondent Payne County District Court, State of Oklahoma to respond filed.
- Apr 21 2026Petition for a writ of prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 21, 2026)