Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Jermel Arcilicia Taylor v. Matthew S. Anderson, et al.

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 25-1693 · judgment June 27, 2025

Dismissed · October 5, 2026

Question presented

-Sr S e $ e I P-fisJ/P ' Aru/erSo'^ kt 5 ’f't^Cr <Sv^ Se^^X ^C J^ec^yAV /7m^ a^- ^j? SS f^^i>~\ ■A'/^^n. co^\ Form 42.010

For petitioner
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor

For respondent
—

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Oct 05 2026
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Jackson, dissenting: I respectfully dissent from the order barring this incarcerated petitioner from filing future in forma pauperis petitions in noncriminal matters. See Howell v. Circuit Court of Indiana, 607 U. S. ___ (2026) (Jackson, J., dissenting).
Sep 03 2026
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
Jul 08 2025
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 20, 2026)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Petition Appendix