Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Ann Lutnes

IFP petition


Pending

Questions presented

  1. Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a state court from exercising continuing jurisdiction over fundamental parental liberty interests when the mandatory post-deprivation hearing required by statute to establish that jurisdiction never lawfully occurred.

  2. Whether a writ of mandamus lies to compel a state court to conduct the post­ deprivation hearing required by statute and to rule upon a timely jurisdictional challenge before adjudicating fundamental parental rights, where the trial court refused to rule on that challenge and the state’s highest court dismissed the only available extraordinary remedy on procedural grounds caused by clerk obstruction.

  3. Whether exhaustion of state remedies is excused under McCarthy v. Madigan, 503 U.S. 140 (1992), when court personnel prevented compliance with the procedural conditions required to maintain the state extraordinary writ proceeding.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Ann Lutnes

For respondent
Jacqueline Humphrey Chafin Sullivan
Oklahoma Attorney General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Aug 20 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
  2. Aug 04 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent Payne County District Court, State of Oklahoma to respond filed.
  3. Apr 21 2026
    Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 10, 2026)