Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Octavio Jimenez-Marquez v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 24-2145 · judgment April 3, 2026
Pending
Question presented
The question presented is: Whether the phrase “in furtherance of” in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the Petitioner.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Gregory Mitchell Acton Sr.
Acton Law Office, PC
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jul 16 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jul 11 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jun 29 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 5, 2026)