Larry Roosevelt Carter v. Heidi E. Washington, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections

I. DOES THE GRANTING OF BROAD DISCRETIONARY POWERS TO THE MICHIGAN PAROliE BOARD ENCOURAGE THE STATE OF MICHIGAN TO INFRINGE UPON THE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS OF STATE PRISONERS? p. 3 II. DOES MICHIGAN VIOLATE 14TH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS WHEN IT USES THE PHRASE "NO dlBERTY INTEREST" AGAINST STATE PRISONERS WHO HAVE SERVED THEIR MINIMUM SENTENCES, AND BY VIRTUE OF "GOOD BEHAVIOR" AND A "PAROLABLE" SENTENCE HAVE EARNED A CHANCE AT LIBERTY? p. 4 III. IS THE USE OF INACCURATE DATA TO DENY A PRISONER HIS LIBERTY TANTAMOUNT TO FALSE IMPRISONMENT? p. 5 IV. IS THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAY TO WAREHOUSE STATE PRISONERS FIRST TO DEPRIVE THEM OF THEIR DUE PROCESS RIGHTS (WHICH IS THE NECESSARY INGREDIENT FOR BROAD DISCRETIONARY POWERS TO FLOURISH)? p. 6 V. ARE THE COURTS MORE CONCERNED ABOUT PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF STATE AUTHORITIES THAN THEY ARE ABOUT PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF STATE CITIZENS? p. 8