Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Babiker E. Osman v. Maggie K. Hanson
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Minnesota, No. A25-1317 · judgment April 14, 2026
(petition-stage, structural)
Well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weights this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
Whether a pro se litigant's fundamental right to procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment is violated when a trial court terminates an employment action via a remote video system by cutting off the video communication feed without warning, immediately signing a dismissal order in the litigant's forced absence, and completely denying the litigant any opportunity to object or address the court.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Babiker E. Osman
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
—
Proceedings
- Jul 15 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 9, 2026)