Kerry Raheb, et ux. v. James Jerome, Jr.

Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is violated when a state court enters a judgment exceeding $320,000 against individuals without a trial, without a jury, and after denying them any meaningful opportunity to present evidence or cross-examine witnesses.

Whether a state court’s denial of relief under Rule 60(b) constitutes an abuse of discretion, and a violation of due process, when the record contains clear evidence of judicial bias, retaliatory litigation, and fraud regarding the existence of an easemerit.

Whether a judge’s participation in multiple overlapping civil and criminal proceedings against the same parties—including extending stalking orders without hearings, imposing a nearly year-long curfew, and removing firearms from the victims of a shooting—creates an unconstitutional appearance of bias requiring recusal and vacatur of the resulting judgment.