Gian Martinez-Ferrate, et al. v. Utah, et al.

Whether Presidential Elector Candidates suffer a concrete and particularized injury sufficient to establish Article III standing when state officials remove them from the general election ballot after determining that their Pledged Presidential Candidate is constitutionally ineligible.

Whether a State may deny ballot access to qualified Presidential Elector Candidates by adjudicating the constitutional eligibility of their Pledged Presidential Candidate where state law identifies the Presidential Electors, not the presidential nominee as the relevant ballot candidates.

Whether the decision below conflicts with this Court's precedents recognizing that exclusion from the ballot and burdens on political participation constitute judicially cognizable injuries under Article III.

Whether allowing individual States to determine presidential eligibility in a manner that excludes otherwise qualified Presidential Elector Candidates creates the very state-by-state inconsistency that this Court cautioned against in Trump v. Anderson.