Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Faith Townsend v. Rockwell Automation, Inc., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 24-3680 · judgment March 5, 2025
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Questions presented
TO THE COURT
-
Is it a violation of U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1 due process when a court purposely drives a complaint into the appeals phase to the Supreme court as a way to adjudicate the case. By applying laws differently from the cases it cites, adjudicated in its court and differently from the Supreme court?
-
Is it a violation of U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1 due process for a court to present defenses on behalf of a defendant, while denying the plaintiff opportunity to respond to those defenses and denying the plaintiff full benefit of precedent setting cases it cites to?
-
Is it a violation of U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1 due process when a judge convert claims and motions into other claims and motions, such as a motion for leave into the motion and a claim of fraud on the Court FRCP 60(d)3 into fraud FRCP 60(b)3 when it’s reason for doing so is not supported by the facts?
-
Is it a violation of U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1 due process when the court aggressively defends the defendant but refuses to read or give any credence to the plaintiff’s complaint?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Faith Townsend
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 5, 2026 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 05 2026Petition DENIED.
- Aug 26 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- May 31 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 10, 2026)