Faith Townsend v. Rockwell Automation, Inc., et al.

TO THE COURT

1. Is it a violation of U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1 due process when a court purposely drives a complaint into the appeals phase to the Supreme court as a way to adjudicate the case. By applying laws differently from the cases it cites, adjudicated in its court and differently from the Supreme court?

2. Is it a violation of U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1 due process for a court to present defenses on behalf of a defendant, while denying the plaintiff opportunity to respond to those defenses and denying the plaintiff full benefit of precedent setting cases it cites to?

3. Is it a violation of U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1 due process when a judge convert claims and motions into other claims and motions, such as a motion for leave into the motion and a claim of fraud on the Court FRCP 60(d)3 into fraud FRCP 60(b)3 when it’s reason for doing so is not supported by the facts?

4. Is it a violation of U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1 due process when the court aggressively defends the defendant but refuses to read or give any credence to the plaintiff’s complaint?