Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Spartan Securities Group, Ltd., et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 22-13129 · judgment January 16, 2026


38%
estimated cert probability
(petition-stage, structural)
95% interval 25%–52%
Rule 10: dissent below, circuit split argued
At the Nov 6 conference: granted 0.14% · GVR 0.14% · relisted 5.9% · denied 94%
Granted ever, conference-stage estimate: 4.4%

About 9.1× the 4.1% base rate. The model weights this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a circuit split argued in the petition, and an Eleventh Circuit decision below.

Questions presented

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulates microcap securities through Rule 15c2-11. It requires a broker-dealer to review information about an issuer and security and confirm its review in a nonpublic Form 211 submitted to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). If FINRA approves a Form 211, the securities are cleared for public quotation on the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market. A transfer agent then obtains electronic trading of the issuer’s shares through a private clearinghouse called the Depository Trust Corporation (“DTC”). A jury found Petitioners liable on only one of the SEC’s 14 claims, which alleged that they submitted misleading Forms 211 to FINRA and made two misstatements to the DTC. Yet the court ordered Petitioner Island Capital Management LLC, a transfer agent, to disgorge more than $150,000, representing the fees it received from certain issuers and their affiliates who, unbeknownst to Petitioners, were engaged in fraudulent misconduct. The questions presented are:

  1. Whether a nonpublic statement or omission made to a private self-regulatory organization or to DTC, where there is no evidence any investor saw or heard the statement, is made “in connection with the purchase or sale of any security” within the meaning of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

  2. Whether, after Liu v. S.E.C., 591 U.S. 71

  3. and Sripetch v. S.E.C., 608 U.S. ___, 146 S. Ct. 1403 (2026), courts may deviate from traditional equitable principles by awarding the SEC disgorgement in the absence of any harmed investors and directing that the disgorged funds be paid to the Treasury.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
John Julian Vecchione
The New Civil Liberties Alliance

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Subject area
Economic Activity (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Linked docket
26A18

Proceedings

  1. Oct 15 2026
    Amicus brief of Investor Choice Advocates Network and Jamie Quick submitted.
  2. Oct 14 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2026.
  3. Oct 09 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent Federal Respondents to respond filed.
  4. Aug 28 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 15, 2026)
  5. Jul 06 2026
    Application (26A18) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until August 28, 2026.
  6. Jun 30 2026
    Application (26A18) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 29, 2026 to September 27, 2026, submitted to Justice Thomas.