Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Spartan Securities Group, Ltd., et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 22-13129 · judgment January 16, 2026
(petition-stage, structural)
About 9.1× the 4.1% base rate. The model weights this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a circuit split argued in the petition, and an Eleventh Circuit decision below.
Questions presented
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulates microcap securities through Rule 15c2-11. It requires a broker-dealer to review information about an issuer and security and confirm its review in a nonpublic Form 211 submitted to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). If FINRA approves a Form 211, the securities are cleared for public quotation on the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market. A transfer agent then obtains electronic trading of the issuer’s shares through a private clearinghouse called the Depository Trust Corporation (“DTC”). A jury found Petitioners liable on only one of the SEC’s 14 claims, which alleged that they submitted misleading Forms 211 to FINRA and made two misstatements to the DTC. Yet the court ordered Petitioner Island Capital Management LLC, a transfer agent, to disgorge more than $150,000, representing the fees it received from certain issuers and their affiliates who, unbeknownst to Petitioners, were engaged in fraudulent misconduct. The questions presented are:
-
Whether a nonpublic statement or omission made to a private self-regulatory organization or to DTC, where there is no evidence any investor saw or heard the statement, is made “in connection with the purchase or sale of any security” within the meaning of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
-
Whether, after Liu v. S.E.C., 591 U.S. 71
-
and Sripetch v. S.E.C., 608 U.S. ___, 146 S. Ct. 1403 (2026), courts may deviate from traditional equitable principles by awarding the SEC disgorgement in the absence of any harmed investors and directing that the disgorged funds be paid to the Treasury.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John Julian Vecchione
The New Civil Liberties Alliance
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Economic Activity (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage
Linked docket
26A18
Proceedings
- Oct 15 2026Amicus brief of Investor Choice Advocates Network and Jamie Quick submitted.
- Oct 14 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2026.
- Oct 09 2026Waiver of right of respondent Federal Respondents to respond filed.
- Aug 28 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 15, 2026)
- Jul 06 2026Application (26A18) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until August 28, 2026.
- Jun 30 2026Application (26A18) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 29, 2026 to September 27, 2026, submitted to Justice Thomas.