Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Albert Ekladyous v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 26-1004 · judgment May 14, 2026


0%
estimated cert probability
(petition-stage, structural)
At the Nov 6 conference: granted 0% · GVR 0% · relisted 1.8% · denied 98%
Granted ever, conference-stage estimate: 0.02%

Well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weights this down for a self-represented petitioner.

Questions presented

  1. Whether a court of appeals may dismiss as untimely under 49 U.S.C. § 30161(a) a petition for review alleging that an agency has failed to perform a discrete, mandatory statutory duty, by treating the claim as a challenge to a completed rule under 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) rather than as a claim of agency action unlawfully withheld under 5 U.S.C. § 706(1).

  2. Whether a claim that an agency has not adopted the performance standard Congress made part of a statutory definition—here, the SAE International Standard J3069 requirements incorporated in IIJA § 24212(a)(1)—states a reviewable claim of agency action unlawfully withheld under 5 U.S.C. § 706(1), where the agency has issued a rule that expressly departs from that standard.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Albert Ekladyous

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 14 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2026.
  2. Oct 08 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent Nat. Hwy. Traffic Admin., et al. to respond filed.
  3. Oct 05 2026
    Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
  4. Sep 02 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 9, 2026)