Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Andre L. Echols, Jr. v. Tom Hansel, Assistant Corporation Counsel, City of Chicago, Illinois
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 25-1806 · judgment June 5, 2026
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether this Court should reconsider and overrule, or substantially limit, Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), which holds that prosecutors are absolutely immune from damages liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for acts taken in initiating and presenting prosecutions, even when a plaintiff alleges malicious prosecution, knowing use or solicitation of false testimony, lack of probable cause, or bad faith.
-
Whether absolute prosecutorial immunity under § 1983 should extend to a municipal attorney prosecuting a civil vehicle-impoundment enforcement proceeding where the plaintiff alleges that the attorney pursued the proceeding despite false testimony and an unlawful impoundment.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Lawrence C. Redmond
Larry Redmond, Esq.
For respondent
Julian N. Henriques Jr.
City of Chicago Department of Law
Case
Subject area
Civil Rights (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 13, 2026 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 13 2026Petition DENIED.
- Sep 23 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2026.
- Sep 15 2026Waiver of right of respondent Tom Hansel to respond filed.
- Sep 03 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 8, 2026)