Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Beverly Pellegrini v. Fresno County Public Guardian as Trustee, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District, No. F088717 · judgment November 26, 2025
(petition-stage, structural)
Well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weights this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Questions presented
-
Whether the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause and Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause are violated when state courts, without statutory authority over the property or parties, affirm orders by materially misrepresenting evidence to liquidate a surviving spouse's revocable trust assets and transfer them to an instrument that fails as a trust by operation of law for distribution to county government employees and other non beneficiary third parties.
-
Whether procedural due process is violated when: (i) trial court findings at close are verbatim to pre-trial findings entered on the docket; and (ii) a state appellate court intentionally misstates evidence to avoid review of threshold jurisdictional issues thereby justifying a wrongful taking of property.
-
Whether the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause is violated when a state court, lacking statutory authority over the property and parties of a prior action applies forfeiture: (i) to threshold jurisdictional issues raised but never adjudicated; and (ii) against an unjoined party whose interest derives from a separate trust not at issue in the prior action when preclusion does not apply.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Beverly Pellegrini
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
—
Proceedings
- May 18 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 5, 2026)