Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Philip E. Hahn v. Bergen Regional Medical Center, LP
Paid petition · Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, No. A-1658-23, A-1755-23 · judgment June 18, 2025
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Questions presented
-
Does the United States guarantee the right to trial by jury, of more than just a judge-jury of one, per Article IV, section 4 of the Constitution?
-
Does voir dire in a jury trial satisfy the requirements of a Republican form of government?
-
Is a court created via NJ state law a court of the United States?
-
Is a judge presiding over a court created via NJ state law bound by a law made by a Congress of the United States?
-
Is a law created by a past Congress of the United States a valid federal law?
-
Is a law created by a past Congress of the United States part of the Supreme law of the land?
-
Can a matter be finally resolved in the absence of a jury, of more than just a judge jury of one, confirmation of the presiding judge’s finding of fact?
-
Should the current Supreme court affirm the Supreme court’s opinion in Slocum v. New York Life Insurance Co., 228 US 364? Hahn v. The State of New Jersey, The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey Mark Zarbin ’ TAELE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. Questions presented
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Philip E. Hahn
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 13, 2026 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 13 2026Petition DENIED.
- Sep 23 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2026.
- Feb 26 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 8, 2026)