Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Philip E. Hahn v. Bergen Regional Medical Center, LP

Paid petition · Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, No. A-1658-23, A-1755-23 · judgment June 18, 2025

0%
estimated cert probability
(petition-stage, structural)
Rule 10: circuit split argued

Well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

  1. Does the United States guarantee the right to trial by jury, of more than just a judge-jury of one, per Article IV, section 4 of the Constitution?

  2. Does voir dire in a jury trial satisfy the requirements of a Republican form of government?

  3. Is a court created via NJ state law a court of the United States?

  4. Is a judge presiding over a court created via NJ state law bound by a law made by a Congress of the United States?

  5. Is a law created by a past Congress of the United States a valid federal law?

  6. Is a law created by a past Congress of the United States part of the Supreme law of the land?

  7. Can a matter be finally resolved in the absence of a jury, of more than just a judge­ jury of one, confirmation of the presiding judge’s finding of fact?

  8. Should the current Supreme court affirm the Supreme court’s opinion in Slocum v. New York Life Insurance Co., 228 US 364? Hahn v. The State of New Jersey, The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey Mark Zarbin ’ TAELE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. Questions presented

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Philip E. Hahn

For respondent
—

Case

Conference history
—

Proceedings

  1. Feb 26 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 8, 2026)
    PetitionAppendixProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count