Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Peter Gumm v. AK Steel Corporation
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 24-1767 · judgment March 18, 2025
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether a federal district court errs in granting summary judgment based upon the improper application of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), which runs contrary to the pronouncements in McDonnellDouglas itself, Title VII, Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (2000), and further runs afoul of the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial with the misapplication of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.
-
Whether a federal district court may ignore state law to enforce a purported contractual six-month limitations period, despite a threeyear statute of limitations for state discrimination claims, where there are genuine factual disputes as to whether the plaintiff knowingly agreed to such a waiver and which is contrary to state law, as in the recent Michigan Supreme Court precedent in McMillon v. City of Kalamazoo, 983 N.W.2d 79 (Mich. 2023).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Gwen-Marie Davis
GDH Law Firm
For respondent
John T Below
Bodman PLC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Aug 06 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Jul 30 2025Waiver of right of respondent AK Steel Corporation to respond filed.
- Jul 16 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 25, 2025)