Kerry Kruskal v. Alan Maestas, et al.

Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is violated when a state court affirms the dismissal of civil claims without findings of fact, without evidentiary hearings, and while repeatedly denying discovery, thereby depriving a litigant of any meaningful opportunity to be heard.

Whether the Equal Protection Clause is violated when courts selectively enforce procedural rules—sanctioning a pro se litigant for minor technical errors while excusing licensed attorneys who repeatedly miss deadlines and ignore motions.

Whether pro se litigants are constitutionally entitled to meaningful access to the courts, including liberal construction of filings under Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972), and Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89 (2007), and whether state appellate courts violate due process by refusing to apply those precedents.

Whether a state appellate court violates the Fourteenth Amendment by affirming a trial court judgment that contains no findings of fact or conclusions of law, thereby foreclosing meaningful review of constitutional claims.

Whether the cumulative effect of multiple due process violations—including denial of discovery, refusal to compel testimony, summary