Montgomery Blair Sibley v. Chauncey J. Watches, Judge, Steuben County, New York, et al.

Although this Second Amendment case began seven years ago primarily centered upon the denial of a pistol permit by New York State based upon secret evidence undisclosed to Petitioner, the case metamorphosed into a forensic exposition of the decent of the New York State and federal justice systems far below Constitutional minimums and thus raises the following four (4) important questions for review: WHETHER federal in forma pauperis litigants may be significantly denied immediate access to Court while filing-fee paying litigants suffer no such constraints as the Second Circuit has here below tacitly approved? WHETHER New York’s handgun licensing substantive law and licensing adjudicative practices denied Petitioner: (i) his Second Amendment rights, (ii) due process and (iii) equal protection? WHETHER the Second Circuit's refusal to address significant issues raised by Petitioner by summarily claiming those issues were “without merit” impermissibly trespassed upon Petitioner’s right to “petition” and be meaningfully “heard” and thereby breached the settled principle that litigants in similar situations should be treated the same, a fundamental component of stare decisis and the rule of law? WHETHER the corrigendum of 42 United States Code §1983 required by the “separation-of-powers ” principle and intellectual integrity obligates this Court to reconsider the scope of the judge-made doctrine of judicial immunity stated in Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 547, 554 (1967)?