Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Nathaniel David Struening v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 24-11082 · judgment July 2, 2025
Question presented
Whether the appellate court violated Petitioner's constitutional right to proceed pro se by ignoring his proceed pro se in September 2024 before the Opening Brief was submitted. Whether the district court plainly erred in proceeding to sentencing without a presentence investigati the docket. Whether the district court and appellate court plainly erred in knowingly and vindictively applying the pre-2016 Sentencing Guideliness to an offense for which it knew all relevant conducted occurred in and af
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Nathaniel David Struening
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jul 16 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jul 09 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Sep 25 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2026)