Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Nathaniel David Struening v. United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 24-11082 · judgment July 2, 2025


Pending

Question presented

Whether the appellate court violated Petitioner's constitutional right to proceed pro se by ignoring his proceed pro se in September 2024 before the Opening Brief was submitted. Whether the district court plainly erred in proceeding to sentencing without a presentence investigati the docket. Whether the district court and appellate court plainly erred in knowingly and vindictively applying the pre-2016 Sentencing Guideliness to an offense for which it knew all relevant conducted occurred in and af

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Nathaniel David Struening

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jul 16 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
  2. Jul 09 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
  3. Sep 25 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2026)