Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Devin Randolph
IFP petition
Question presented
Whether extraordinary relief in the nature of prohibition is warranted to prevent further proceedings in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio under a disputed procedural posture where unresolved issues concerning the operative complaint, service, amendment, Rule 26(f) scheduling, filing restrictions, medical accommodation, employer identity, party identity, and judicial appearance allegedly affect Petitioner's meaningful access to court before discovery, sanctions, dismissal, default consequences, or merits-related proceedings continue.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Devin Randolph
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 5, 2026 · Prohibition denied
Proceedings
- Oct 05 2026Petition DENIED.
- Sep 21 2026Supplemental brief of petitioner Devin Randolph filed. (Distributed)
- Aug 06 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jan 23 2026Petition for a writ of prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 17, 2026)