Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Devin Randolph
IFP petition
Question presented
Whether extraordinary relief in the nature of mandamus is warranted to require the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio to properly identify the operative complaint, clarify the defendants properly included in the action, address representation and service defects involving Bath & Body Works, Inc. and Vorys, address default/default-related relief, answer the structural-relief questions presented in Exhibit A and address all requested relief in Exhibit A, provide emergency stay or pause relief if necessary, establish meaningful medical-accommodation and protected medical-proof procedures, correct the Rule 26(f) record and discovery posture, stabilize proceedings after the lower court refused meaningful correction, and reassign or transfer the case to a neutral judge and region, including the Southern District of New York if necessary to restore public confidence and meaningful access to court.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Devin Randolph
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 5, 2026 · Mandamus denied
Proceedings
- Oct 05 2026Petition DENIED.
- Sep 21 2026Supplemental brief of petitioner Devin Randolph filed. (Distributed)
- Aug 06 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jan 23 2026Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 17, 2026)