Caleb L. McGillvary v. Jennifer Davenport, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.

1.) Is the practice of numerous Courts of Appeals, summarily denying pro se habeas appeals by copy and pasted boilerplate without full review, or sometimes without any judicial review at all of the papers, a deprivation of Due Process requiring the Supreme Court to exercise its oversight and direct the Courts of Appeals to provide sufficient safeguards to guarantee Due Process in pro se habeas corpus cases? 2.) When the issue of exhaustion was waived by the State, and not raised by the District Court; does it wreak a fundamental unfairness and manifest injustice upon Petitioner, for it to be raised by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, without briefing, on application for Certificate of Appealability? 3.) When the factual bases of claims; that Petitioner made a timely pre­ trial written request to self-represent, and that the State withheld evidence until after trial that the family of the alleged victim bribed two state witnesses $150,000 each; have been raised in the District Court but not reached by its opinion- is the finding of the Court of Appeals that the claims lack "arguable merit" on application for COA made without jurisdiction as held by Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U. S. 322, 336, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 154 L. Ed. 2d 931 (2003)?