Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Manuel Yepiz, Rafael Yepiz, Jose Luis Mejia, Sergio Mejia, Ernesto Orozco Mendez, Gilberto Carrasco, Francisco Zambrano, Jesus Contreras, Mariano Meza v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 24-1684, 24-1685, 24-1687, 24-1688, 24-1690, 24-1691, 24-1709, 24-1784, 24-1915 · judgment December 30, 2025
Questions presented
-
Whether certiorari should be granted to resolve a split in the circuits as to whether bad faith suppression of exculpatory impeachment evidence by the government is relevant to the materiality analysis of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963 (Brady)?
-
Whether certiorari should be granted to resolve a split in the circuits as to whether the district court must hold an evidentiary hearing after the appellate court has remanded for fact finding on Brady violations or whether the district court may resolve credibility issues based solely on a hearsay declaration from the prosecutor?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Verna Jean Wefald
Attorney at Law
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jul 02 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jun 24 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jun 03 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2026)