Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Hamid Michael Hejazi v. Joshua Shane Bartlett, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 25-6217 · judgment February 25, 2026
Questions presented
-
Whether Rule 24(a)(2) requires intervention as of right when the proposed intervenors constitutional claim cannot be protected in the no-record municipal forum where he was prosecuted.
-
Whether existing class counsel adequately represents a proposed intervenor when counsel refuses to litigate the enforcement problem that keeps statewide relief from reaching the municipal court.
-
Whether a statewide right-to-counsel remedy may be rendered ineffective when the municipal court proceeds without the constitutional safeguards required by the Betschart protective order.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Hamid Michael Hejazi
For respondent
Paul L. Smith
Oregon Department of Justice - Appellate Division
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jul 02 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jun 24 2026Waiver of right of respondent State of Oregon to respond filed.
- May 26 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2026)