Giovanni Thomas Jasso v. Andre Gonzales, Acting Warden

l~l|he-Vher ex ccobchon tor cxldincj exnA oJoeWln<^ recorder vloVxheS du€ process under dacKson \J. xArgvn^/^ its. 2>otwhere -the evidence shows only presence cxnd cxvhoi<yous c^ndoch, wWhoiA proo-f oh l-nVenY Vo VacAltaVe Ahe cnw\e2, Whether -Vhe adtnlssion o-f highly prejudicial gang evidence VioVAes doe process where \V renders Ahe Arlcd Vundamen-Wly UnWc undec EsA-ell-e \i. He(huire,5o2 U.S. G2 Xmi): 3-VdheVhec Ahe Cunnul^Aive eWccA- eV- ’rooAlp^e Avlc\ errors Cao deny due process evert where XndlvlducJ errors ore domed harmless. 4. Whe+her AW lower courts wilsoipphed the cecYvhiccAe of /^ppecUnh\lAy sVc^nAxcd endec SlaeK V. VA.cV<=\n\e\ and HlheC-EL V, Co>c«RJ by denying a cechlhlc^e AppealaVihty deSfde J^b^Veble C^ns-ViVuEi0 n a\ clhxtvx 6.