Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Zioness Movement, Inc. v. The Lawfare Project, Inc.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 24-974 · judgment August 13, 2025


Certiorari denied · March 9, 2026
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Petitioner Zioness Movement, Inc. is a nonprofit entity that is the registered owner of the Zioness word mark. Amanda Berman, the founder of Zioness Movement, Inc., began using the Zioness mark while she was still employed at a separate nonprofit entity, Respondent The Lawfare Project, Inc. After the mark was registered to Zioness Movement, The Lawfare Project sought to cancel Zioness Movement’s registered mark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Zioness Movement sought a declaration of ownership in the district court and The Lawfare Project counterclaimed seeking a declaration of ownership. The district court determined that both Zioness Movement and The Lawfare Project co-owned the mark—an outcome never contemplated in the litigation or argued for by either party during trial. The court of appeals, in a summary order, affirmed the district court on this issue, finding that Zioness Movement “cannot establish the ‘fundamental error’ required to reverse after its waiver of any objection to the verdict form permitting a finding of co-ownership.” The questions presented are: 1. Whether, under the Lanham Act, a court or jury may find joint ownership of a trademark between competing entities—neither of which pleaded or proved co-ownership— without violating the fundamental principle that a trademark must indicate a single source of goods or services to consumers.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Kristie Marie Blase
Felicello Law P.C.

For respondent
Terrence A. Oved
Oved & Oved LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Mar 09 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Feb 18 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2026.
  3. Feb 17 2026
    Reply of petitioner Zioness Movement, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
  4. Feb 04 2026
    Brief of respondent The Lawfare Project, Inc. in opposition filed.
  5. Jan 27 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 4, 2026.
  6. Jan 26 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 28, 2026 to February 4, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Dec 22 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 28, 2026)