Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Anthony Mangram v. United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 24-40330 · judgment October 3, 2025


Pending

Question presented

NOTICE OF UNTIMELINESS: This petition is submitted as an untimely petition in a criminal case pursuant to the Clerk’s instruction dated February 25, 2026. • Whether the Fifth Circuit violated the Sixth Amendment and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by permitting withdrawal of appellate counsel where the Anders brief failed to address non-frivolous constitutional issues apparent on the record. • Whether a criminal conviction obtained under an indictment that failed to allege drug quantity violates the Fifth Amendment Grand Jury Clause and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(c)(1), where drug quantity was later used to enhance punishment. • Whether ineffective assistance of both trial and appellate counsel—compounded by the court’s acceptance of a deficient Anders brief—constitutes structural error requiring reversal. • Whether denial of meaningful appellate review violates Due Process under the Fifth Amendment and the historic guarantees of Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Anthony Wayne Mangram

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jun 25 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
  2. Jun 16 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
  3. Jan 28 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2026)