Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Fousseini Tounkara v. James Macy, Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 23-1368 · judgment December 26, 2024
Questions presented
-
Whether a reviewing court may uphold an Administrative Law Judge's adverse credibility determination in a Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act case when that determination is unsupported by substantial evidence and contradicted by the preponderance of medical and testimonial proof.
-
Whether the Ninth Circuit's deference to an AU's credibility finding—despite lack of factual support and conflict with uncontroverted medical evidence—violates the Fifth Amendment and the statutory requirement that agency decisions reflect the entire record.
-
Whether a court of appeals may refuse to consider exculpatory medical and audio evidence solely because it was excluded from the administrative record where the exclusion resulted directly from the AU's procedural rulings.
-
Whether a reviewing court may affirm an administrative decision where the AU (1) denied Petitioner the right to present his case first; (2) cut off cross-examination of a vocational expert;
-
excluded a disputed allegation as "irrelevant" while still relying on it; and (4) returned Petitioner's pretrial exhibits before they could be admitted, ensuring they were not part of the record. Page 1 of 6
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Fousseini Tounkara
For respondent
Pamela J. Lormand
Lormand Law, LLC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jul 16 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jul 06 2026Waiver of right of respondents Glacier Fish Company and Clarendon National Insurance Company As Successor in Interest to Sea Bright Insurance Company to respond filed.
- Jun 16 2026Waiver of right of respondent James Macy, Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs to respond filed.
- May 21 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2026)