In Re Gurjot Singh Dhaliwal

Can the State of California with moral turpitude & under the color of the law in coordination with multiple government actors violate the rules of Habeas Corpus? Aren’t these actions slavery, murder, and terrorism of the victims by their assailants?

Can the State of California charge a defendant with no probable cause, accusation is not proof, and then circumvent the Constitution of the United States using an excuse of Pandemic to suspend and extend legal proceedings with no proof of a crime being committed? Aren’t these actions in violation of the rules of Habeas Corpus?

Can the State of California charge a defendant with no probable cause, accusation is not proof, and then circumvent the Constitution of the United States using an excuse of Mental Health to suspend and extend legal proceedings with no proof of a crime being committed? Aren’t these actions in violation of the rules of Habeas Corpus?

Can the State of California participate in a criminal conspiracy to commit kidnapping? If the court does nothing to help recover kidnapped minor children when presented with direct evidence proof of their abduction doesn’t that make them a co-conspirator? Isn’t this a violation of the rules of Habeas Corpus of those minor children who are not recovered?

Can a pandemic be an excuse for state courts to circumvent a defendant’s constitutional rights? Can they violate the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States, the rules of Habeas Corpus, and a defendant’s 6th amendment right to a speedy trial?

Isn’t it a violation of the rules of Habeas Corpus under the color of the law to arrest and detain a person without probable cause and hold them in custody with excessive bail amounts? Shouldn’t this be considered kidnapping, slavery, and murder of a human being by the state?

Can mental health be an excuse for state courts to circumvent a defendant’s constitutional rights in violation of the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States and the rules of Habeas Corpus?

Doesn’t subject matter jurisdiction allow Senior Courts to take over jurisdiction of lower courts when massive public corruption is clearly demonstrated in the