Leihinahina Sullivan v. United States

Que&hone> Pvesen-led (0 Whether -Dedendctn-f- relied on Tudne T. MioWael fe> l£ she plod oup 4o 4 couds all -the o4t»e< counts would be^orie, (a/hen 4-hey were- nob as* Defends n"F was Senje/vodJo <gt(| charged and Uncharged conduct- which Ddendanb toeheved tV~vvat> all - dc^urHed conduct- based on whaV'Jud^© T. Michd-^l Scctbvgld- said? Appecd IXCj July aoih( 2024 , Tkanscnp^, ECFMo. izczl| p^ag/ LQ. 1^2^/ ' cou^t we^o 4hrD>t^h Vvi-Hn 4We>, ^ll o(- 4hose oVVie«< Counts ^eks dismissed. TheyVe> ^one . Okay^ C2-) WheHner De^encbnM' reliance- on : JucA^je'CT. Micbael Scwbn^l'rhC' JuckjGSe%hn^kJ/^) eHcdewienis -Vhctk J she- pled octi- 4t? 4 counts. 4heo+her eh/ara^-A n«\A Urv'WirTSisd frsvdctcJ would \NO£> & 1& 1 ^(c)\nthaId apply -fo he^^jirirg her inr>me<dierVe; telect==e Ld) VVVie+her voluntanness o-t- +4tc ple^ or ils mtelli^enl' chdracteK hets been in-fecleol by -the •consfihxbcmA.I ewor?