Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Roy Allen Nichols
IFP petition
Questions presented
OUESTION(s) PRESENTED The Petitioner states that the issues presented ARE ones of great public interest and Constitutional importance, but that they also raise the following Constitutional questions:
-
. Which Article in the U.S. Constitution specifically provides for cession of lands from any of the 50 Union States to the United States?
-
. For what specific purpose(s) are those lands acquired by the United States through cession from the 50 Union States?
-
. What was the intent of Article VI, clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, as was written, understood, interpreted, and adopted by the Framers?
-
. Is morality an actual and true enumerated power granted to Congress by the U.S. Constitution, as was written and adopted by the Framers?
-
. Does Congress possess any true, actual, delegated power and authority under the U.S. Constitution to create, define, legislate, enact, and punish issues of morality?
-
. Was the imposition of Chapter 110, 18 USC, a valid and appropriate, or was it an invalid and. inappropriate exercise of Congress' true actual power confer red by the U.S. Constitution?
-
. What are the only crimes that the U.S. Constitution had specifically enumer ated and granted Congress the power and authority to legislate over and to pro vide punishment for?
-
. Can an inferior legislative district court created by Congress under Article 1, section 8, clause 17 of the U.S..Constitution, sitting outside the realm of the District of Columbia, be legally conferred with criminal jurisdiction, or subject-matter jurisdiction?
-
. Does the current interpretation of the Commerce and Necessary and. Proper clauses by Congress, the Federal Government, and the inferior district courts comport with the original understanding, intent, interpretation, and purpose as was written and adopted by the Framers? The Petitioner states that the answers to these questions are not 'rocket science', but can be truly answered by adhering to the let ter of the U.S. Constitutionand this Court's sworn Oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Roy Allen Nichols
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 08 2026Petition DENIED.
- May 20 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2026.
- Dec 30 2025Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.