Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Sheena Sitzema v. Civil Service Commission
IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Michigan, No. 373752 · judgment May 22, 2025
Question presented
QUESTION I: DO THE MICHIGAN CIVIL SERVICE COMMISION'S RULES AND REGULATIONS VIOLATE THE 14TH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION? PETITIONER: YES RESPONDANT: NO MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT: NO ANSWER- APPEAL DENIED MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS: NO ANSWER- APPEAL DENIED TRIAL COURT: NO- UNABLE TO RULE ON EVIDENCE QUESTION II: IS THE MICHIGAN CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION’S DECISION SUPPORTED BY COMPETENT, MATERIAL AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE ON THE WHOLE RECORD? PETITIONER: NO RESPONDANT: YES MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT: NO ANSWER- APPEAL DENIED MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS: NO ANSWER-APPEAL DENIED TRIAL COURT: NO- UNABLE TO RULE ON EVIDENCE
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Sheena Sitzema
For respondent
Ann Maurine Sherman
Michigan Department of Attorney General
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Orders
Order list, June 29, 2026 · Certiorari denied
Order list, October 5, 2026 · Rehearing denied
Proceedings
- Oct 05 2026Rehearing DENIED.
- Sep 09 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jul 24 2026Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Jun 29 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jun 10 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2026.
- Jun 08 2026Waiver of right of respondent Civil Service Commission to respond filed.
- Feb 19 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 8, 2026)