Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Sheena Sitzema v. Civil Service Commission
IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Michigan, No. 373752 · judgment May 22, 2025
Question presented
QUESTION I: DO THE MICHIGAN CIVIL SERVICE COMMISION'S RULES AND REGULATIONS VIOLATE THE 14TH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION? PETITIONER: YES RESPONDANT: NO MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT: NO ANSWER- APPEAL DENIED MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS: NO ANSWER- APPEAL DENIED TRIAL COURT: NO- UNABLE TO RULE ON EVIDENCE QUESTION II: IS THE MICHIGAN CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION’S DECISION SUPPORTED BY COMPETENT, MATERIAL AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE ON THE WHOLE RECORD? PETITIONER: NO RESPONDANT: YES MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT: NO ANSWER- APPEAL DENIED MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS: NO ANSWER-APPEAL DENIED TRIAL COURT: NO- UNABLE TO RULE ON EVIDENCE
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Sheena Sitzema
For respondent
Ann Maurine Sherman
Michigan Department of Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jul 24 2026Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Jun 29 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jun 10 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2026.
- Jun 08 2026Waiver of right of respondent Civil Service Commission to respond filed.
- Feb 19 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 8, 2026)