Carter Stephens v. City of Pasadena Fire Department

Whether the denial of petitioner’s right to present eight valid medical reports from his treating doctors at a California workers’ compensation trial violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Whether barring the petitioner from cross-examining Respondents’ key witnesses, while admitting false and unauthorized documents against his objections, violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

Whether the allowance of damaging evidence that Petitioner was prohibited from questioning on cross-examination violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

IFP was not sought in any other court

Why has the City of Pasadena denied injury claims, analyst, evaluation, treatment, compensation, and future medical to petitioner Stephens, to this day.

Why has petitioner Stephens had to go and obtain authorized work comp doctors on his own, to get his injures analyzed, evaluated, treated, compensated for, and addressed for future medical.

Why have not all injuries to Petitioner Stephens been accepted and covered by the City of Pasadena as valid injuries.