Edward Allen Moore v. Gregory Hancock, Warden, et al.

Whether Missouri Supreme Gotxrt Rule 30.20 plain error review qualifies as a 28 U.S. C. § 2254(d) adjudication on the merits?

Does holding that a motion to remand a direct appeal is not the proper procedure in Missouri for raising Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959) claims conflict with State v. Terry, 304 S.W.3d 105 (Mo banc 2010)?

Is a judgment that fails to adjudicate a claim in a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition a final judgment?

Are federal habeas courts required to acknowledge asserted cause and/or asserted gateway actual innocence proffered to excuse procedural default and determine whether either excuses procedural default?

Are federal habeas courts required to acknowledge evidence in the state court record of Brady and Napue violations and perform Brady and Napue analyses?

If a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petitioner avails himself to an established state court procedure for developing facts, but the state court withholds the procedure, did the petitioner fail to develop the factual basis for his federal, habeas claim in state court within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §2254(e)(2)'s opening clause?

Where a trial judge sua sponte (because the prosecutor neglected to) charges a criminal defendant with being a prior offender and then prosecutes the charge, is this disqualifying significant personal involvement as a prosecutor?