Scottie Bernard Shaver v. Russ Rurka, Acting Warden

(I) DID THE STATE TRIAL JUDGE DISPLAY JUDICIAL BIAS WHEN HE CREATED A BRUTON VIOLATION DURING THE SECOND TRIAL VIOLATING PETITIONER'S SIXTH AMEND RIGHT TO CONFRONTATION? (ID WERE PETITIONER'S CROSS EXAMINATION RIGHTS VIOLATED WHEN ANOTHER WITNESS TESTIFIED TO DR. MILLARD'S CHANGES IN THE DEATH CERTIFICATE WHERE DR. MILLARD DID NOT TESTIFY? (Ill) WERE PETITIONER'S RIGHTS VIOLATED WHEN THE STATE WITHHELD CRUCIAL EVIDENCE PERTAINING TO HIS GUILT OR PUNISHMENT UNDER BRADY V MARYLAND? (IV) WAS DEFENSE COUNSEL CONSTITUTIONALLY INEFFECTIVE FOR NOT PROPERLY INVESTIGATING PETITIONER’S CASE PRIOR TO TRIAL? (V) DID THE PROSECUTOR PROVE, BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, THAT PETITIONER HAD THE NECESSARY SPECIFIC INTENT TO BE CONVICTED OF MURDER? (VI) IS PETITIONER ENTITLED TO A NEW TRIAL BASED ON NEW EVIDENCE OBTAINED BY PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR THOMAS BEREZA, SUPPORTING PETITIONER'S INNOCENCE? (VII) DID THE STATE USE FALSE TESTIMONY TO OBTAIN A CONVICTION VIOLATING PETITIONER'S DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL?