Lavelle Eugene Marks v. Russ Rurka, Acting Warden

(I) DID THE STATE PROSECUTOR (TAYLOR) SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE, MATERIAL TO PETITIONER MARK’S ACTUAL INNOCENCE VIOLATE HIS RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION WARRANTING A NEW TRIAL? (ID WAS PETITIONER MARKS DEPRIVED OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL BY COUNSEL'S FAILING TO OBTAIN THE SUPPRESSED TAPE INTERVIEW OF JAMES MCNEELY? (Ill) WERE PETITIONER’S RIGHTS VIOLATED WHEN THE STATE WITHHELD CRUCIAL EVIDENCE PERTAINING TO HIS GUILT OR PUNISHMENT UNDER BRADY V MARYLAND? (IV) WAS APPELLATE COUNSEL CONSTITUTIONALLY INEFFECTIVE FOR NOT PROPERLY INVESTIGATING PETITIONER'S CASE PRIOR TO THE APPEAL?