Shasta Jones v. Southland Casino

I. Were -Hoe and 6abMj-fec£ -h)~ihe &(Wd~ enough evidence to Cxnnctoto to^t tO&Jp’ e/viA/we^to h^JL> berxme (L h^sto-e CnviWm^ff pos^lbUj escatotMj -to an5*to owmtf du& to to eb dlsctyfcn& fand w-Mbweett ra^ fiat-ecL in toe K'h&tiv) hflrWtoob ^Sped^c^bcj payes II ? £.W toe oaso toiM ^yainft we ^uteto4«£ e/en4Mgh X-tofb neces^trej toepsto prevmto torn l^Sinj nn«j jbb.Tatinj Into U)hzh ^dKi/ltors arvt (Y)ana^ne^ b-tiny idfbng m -Iho u)6'te«|9S ctnd ^penybr&? s VJw 1 w^st.kcaa^ r fepc-rW uM p^ng W M Uj becmc+h€eEOO ^job( destxM^b^ a^stjhay 1 werf w«t DA -Hwjbb job 0/U W uforto; in^wox/ cUliaU, I Wai hot »<Meli -ft> Wtk«^fW^ /iiurtw^^ a^>nst M Rnun plan v L- A<^ aibdartM A^ vJriteup no re^poo^ w X"fc X