Ruth Torres v. Veretta Frazier, Judge, 44th Civil District Court, Dallas County, Texas, et al.

Whether judicial immunity bars all relief—including injunctive or declaratory relief—where state judges acted in the clear absence of jurisdiction and where a state judicial commission later sanctioned one judge for denying due-process. b) Whether U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1 due process and equal protection guarantees were violated when state Administrative Regional Judge’s Wheless presided over summary judgment hearing—without lawful assignment—after prior recusal in related procedure, directed the clerk to reject Petitioner’s answer, and despite lack of statutorily required twenty-one-day hearing notice, issued a permanent, state-wide injunction barring Petitioner’s to be employed in her lawful profession.

1. Whether state judges are disqualified—after a finding by a state judicial oversight body—or via acting lacking jurisdiction and with clear bias, thereby rendering judges orders void under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.

2. Whether appeal not taken in good faith and categorizing Petitioner’s constitutional claims as “frivolous” was warranted because the claims challenged judicial rulings and despite pleading sufficiency and plausibility. WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 2 of 33