Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Edward L. Clark, Jr. v. Deborah L. Clark
IFP petition · Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, No. G064157 · judgment June 25, 2025
Questions presented
-
Does a person representing themselves as a prose litigant automatically forfeit his Fourteenth amendment rights to fair and equal protection under the law in a court with Subject Matter Jurisdiction? If Not
-
Is Subject Matter Jurisdiction still the foundational pre-requisite for any judicial process to be legal, valid and enforceable in the United States?
-
Can a Family Court fabricate and take back subject matter jurisdiction ONCE forfeited, (failing to reserve jurisdiction in judgment before being dismissed) in a dissolution money judgment and after refusing to merge private settlement contracts into the family court judgment for a final accord?
-
Can a family court judge fabricate a new judgment with a different judgment date (11-years later) using a case number no longer at issue over two years prior with a fully executed private settlement contract dated 3/21/2016?
-
Does the “The Law Of The Land Doctrine” allow an appellate court to supersede the long standing precedence of Subject matter jurisdiction, basically allowing an appellate court to validate void orders by adopting an order it issued on the merits of a void order?.
-
Is it standard judicial conduct to issue a pre-filing order as a shield from legal liability to introduce extrinsic fraud to enforce VOID orders under the law, that were issued without subject matter jurisdiction and by a person who is not a judge?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Edward L. Clark Jr.
For respondent
Richard David Brover
Richard D. Brover, Attorney at Law
Proceedings
- Aug 17 2026Supplemental brief of petitioner Edward L. Clark filed. (Distributed)
- Jun 25 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jun 15 2026Application (25A1250) denied by the Court.
- Jun 15 2026Petitioner complied with order of May 26, 2026.
- May 26 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2026.
- May 26 2026The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 16, 2026, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
- May 26 2026Application (25A1250) referred to the Court.
- May 18 2026Application (25A1250) refiled and submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
- May 13 2026Application (25A1250) denied by Justice Kagan.
- May 07 2026Supplemental brief of petitioner Edward L. Clark filed. (Distributed)
- May 06 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2026.
- May 06 2026Supplemental brief of petitioner Edward L. Clark filed. (Distributed)
- Apr 29 2026Waiver of right of respondent Deborah L. Clark to respond filed.
- Apr 27 2026Application (25A1250) for injunction pending the disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kagan.
- Dec 31 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2026)