Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Roger Tedi Edwards v. California
IFP petition · Supreme Court of California, No. S290533 · judgment October 1, 2025
Questions presented
I) C«Jr(vrn?A. La.w ^nForCO^-OA k 4o o$er HeJpfulA£96 4® (IteyJ vn/nlyv^ 4<r Incerhve. 4o'xhelp Se^v^ <k CcW^ kS ttarin^ 4c7\? 3)Shwl4 T)>& OK hfcv£ VSe4 3on(e PenAn &£ k Wi'In^sS fiMtr rrvu^pf^ IncooSlsAenCleS VjWi his S^-^te^A 4tcsF la 4kn la SphnlSfc? 3) Sho^4 fr^w1nKn> "Ju<ke Cc<b5 VfcteUbctve. Offered wll&sfe ^brae. PenOa.40 Specie Sjf’cxnlsh V^en fcCC?<MJlij SfMJVncj En^V^i diHo^ procoJ/Aip? HjShouU 4k COtfpp protfW 3brw Pene»k M "ifhcfCeUc rfk-C h& M prov^n'f'0^ Ate 4& S^< uatarsW Cacjl'^ In mvltfpk Vltta) Interview vMkU? 5)5houl4 DAS haw. been t-Kov^d 4° W$AblJ 7f4o<m4^ SucA Off^c‘4^n J«4es g( TTdc^^ VenzkJs ^UtlfUusfe U-WStv^ MvS mJ v7<^7(4eCVl«v6 FlShocU Tk Sh4<c£ CuV^cn/K 4k?r'J‘v?Dter/‘Cr7ae4’£nhfa4^a/6> On C&S&S a<> vfotenceor bo4ittj 'njUf''| <vvv]da^- £.VKn c$f'ch>r? 7)SliouU C^hfocAX D<sfc'<^ MAom^uis oJ4c^c<f 4d <Ut) C(vses4rot^ olkr s^</es 06 s/r7ks \Jkn4ku o>g£.l Cc?ferf<v pF CnlfForn/x Ljuv? ' S)Sh(wlJ coup/s r^^-f rAce. w(4n^s 4o pvWM juctvcs? ‘OSKwM 'a/IW^Sz-S "4 £M^?4/jhfc-to hv7a»j ecf-fotvy^ CDkCfKJak 4ktn ba hoW 4® ch-Aoy. sF#kp^d/? I'll Io)5hoj4 joc^ pco? be-wrefFable '$ ctx^^tvk^ ps^rs? n)ShooU e/Ms >£wuo (U4xy^5 kv^bun a-^SSkU^ (w/Wscr/^p^esa^/Ji/j) Supns^ Gw4 OF CR err bu| 4en^ -for Covasd A/Scov^u? D)ShovU CKSt huve bon AlGrS^J 4&ec C.VPD a4 DA? I4)SKoj1A J)K (tAfcci pen^?n^ Cl^s dur<r^ h^Anc^s/S6r^nC?rn>? «4Krr^5 be. belj nccDj44^o 4<r tejvsfo, 4o fx-e&rt '(nWZc&s Suck hou/ ZF reyegfej TTohn L. rou^. c? fe <a qp£nlni|'bcrJr? MShoul4 ‘iu^s Vg- hdA kcaxr44>U v*Jkn (ndQnvMs# S^t^e^-As oJboj4 census <S 0 <4 la Wpe-Mw- CpcA's ^?r^JAec?Sion 4Ar^tneJ U n©r ^liru| oF 4hr4KK M wus tvtwr ^14^^41) bwM, ^ccuxsa^ohs? n) cou4s wtWoSes 4o cKaa^ Sbt^/^nFs aiwnx/; 4^5 (& 'Soc^e Peae^*v J7J? I$)VloulJ ^khFocaivs^ That/-S^r7ks^ u<*w pg, uaCcnsIHuf^W ^ug.4© Double SkopArjM^sjog^^lk 4or usfr^i ouf g^ 3^4^. cas^s hw7n^ vjM- 4kuj c/jj 4rM/y wt^A /
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Roger Tedi Edwards
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 15 2026Petition DENIED.
- May 27 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2026.
- Dec 09 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2026)