José L. Yeyille v. The Florida Bar

Right to Counsel: Whether the Florida Supreme Court and its agent, The Florida Bar, deprived me, an indigent man, of my right to be represented by counsel protected by the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution before, during, and after disciplinary proceedings against me—who had at all relevant times proceeded as a common citizen—for alleged violations of Rules Regulating The Florida Bar (RRTFB) which are indistinguishable from criminal statutes punishing libel against the government (judiciary).

VLTRA-VIRES: Whether the Florida Supreme Court and its agent, The Florida Bar, acted beyond their jurisdiction—VLTRA’VIRES— by harassing and prosecuting me, a layperson (Citizen Jose) who at all relevant times proceeded only in his personal capacity, for libel against the government (judiciary), and then extorting and suspending attorney Jose Yeyille for ninety-one days for alleged violations of RRTFB indistinguishable from criminal statutes punishing libel against the government (judiciary), violated my rights to Free Speech and Free Association, and to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Anti-SLAPP: Whether the Florida Supreme Court’s and its agent, The Florida Bar’s complaint and prosecution against me for criticizing The judiciary of the state of Florida (public issues in court filings) and denying to me the right to challenge the Report of Referee, and to dismiss their inquisition under Florida Anti-SLAPP Statute §768. 295(4) violated my rights to Free Speech, Free Association, and to Access the Courts, to Petition the Government (judiciary) for a Redress of Grievances protected by the First Amendment, and my rights to a Fair Trial, Due Process, and Equal Protection protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.