Antonio Goodwin v. Cellular Sales Service Group, LLC

Whether 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)( 1) requires vacatur where an arbitration result was obtained through use of false employment records from Real Time Staffing Services LLC and EmployBridge LLC—entities that never employed Petitioner—and where opposing counsel expressly stated in writing that Petitioner was paid by Real Time Staffing Services LLC and that such records would be used to support dismissal.

Whether vacatur is required under 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(2)-(3) where an arbitrator relied on incorrect factual statements, failed to consider substantial racial-discrimination evidence, and issued a dispositive ruling without a full hearing.

Whether due process is violated where courts fail to review evidence demonstrating that an arbitration award was based on false facts, fabricated employment records, misstatements of key evidence, institutional tolerance of arbitrator bias, and systemic failures within the American Arbitration Association. LIST OF PARTIES All parties appear in the caption on the cover page. Petitioner: Antonio Goodwin, pro se. Respondent: Cellular Sales Services Group, LLC. Other persons and entities referenced in the proceedings include: Robert L. Bowman, Esq.; American Arbitration Association (“AAA”); Arbitrator Reginald E. Jones, Esq.; Jonathan Weed, Assistant CEO of the American Arbitration Association; Rebecca Regniere; Real Time Staffing Services LLC; EmployBridge LLC; Hire Dynamics; Andrea Mass; Angel Caraballo; and Rose Caraballo. Additional persons, firms, organizations, and entities referenced in this petition include: Stephanie Stephens; David Ali Chami; Consumer Justice Law Firm, PLC; American Arbitration Association Inc.; Antitrust Arizona News; George Basharis, J.D.; JAMS; National Arbitration and Mediation; AAA-ICDR; Marc J. Goldstein; Melida Hodgson; Goldman Sachs; Continental Towers; Jorge Gaitan; and INTERPOL. RELATED PROCEEDINGS United States District Court for the District of Nevada, case number. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, case number. Arbitration proceeding before Arbitrator Reginald E. Jones, Esq., administered through the American Arbitration Association.