Robert Lauter v. Joseph John Katoskie, III, et al.

How could the trial court have had proper jurisdiction to dismiss res judicata when I am required to serve the adverse parties copies of this petition, yet at the trial level not one of them was served a single shred of paper despite my request that the U.S Marshalls be directed to do so? Are the Courts of appeal really the final authority on procedural posture? If so how did Gideon v Wainright, Bush V Gore and probably hundreds of other procedural cases wind up on the docket? Are the inferior tribunals at the federal level aiding and abetting out of control corruption within Virginia’s municipal and state court system and in naked defiance of this court as it relates to the overturned “Chevron Deference”? All the parties are listed in the caption of the case on the cover page. Related Cases : In Chronological order Robert Lauter V Glaxosmithkline No. 2:16-cv-00716 (E.D. Va.) Robert Lauter V Glaxosmithkline Norfolk Va. Circuit Court CL173292 Joseph John Katoskie III V Lauter Norfolk Va. JDR Court Robert Lauter V The U.S Food and Drug Administration Et AL (No. 20-11203 4th cir) Robert Lauter V Daniel Gillis et Al Suffolk Va. Circuit Court (CL1927) U.S Environmental Protection Agency V Robert Lauter DBA Prime Cut Paint TSCA-03- 2023-0034 Robert Lauter V Joseph John Katoskie III et Al Norfolk Va. Circuit Court (CL22595) Robert Lauter V George Schaeffer et Al No. 21-2189 (4th Cir.) Robert Lauter V the Last Will of Jane Katoskie Norfol Va. Circuit Court (CL221619) Robert Lauter V Joseph Katoskie et Al Norfolk Va. Circuit Court (CL22574)