Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Dominic Miller v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 25-1219 · judgment January 2, 2026
Question presented
Whether Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(b)(2)(E) requires a district court to personally invite a defendant to allocute before imposing a sentence following revocation of supervised release, such that complete denial of that opportunity constitutes plain error warranting resentencing. TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTION PRESENTED................................................................................................ ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ............................................................................................iii PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ..................................................................... 1 OPINIONS BELOW ......................................................................................................... 1 JURISDICTION ................................................................................................................. 1 STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND RULES INVOLVED ............................................ 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ......................................................................................... 3 REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION............................................................. 6 I. The Courts of Appeals Are Intractably Divided 5-3 on Whether Rule 32.1 Requires a Personal Invitation to Allocute ................................................................ 7 II. The Question Presented Is a Recurring Issue of National Importance Affecting Thousands of Federal Revocation Proceedings Annually................... 15 III. The Decision Below Conflicts with This Court’s Recognition of the Common-Law Right of Allocution in Green v. United States ................................ 17 IV. This Case Is an Ideal Vehicle to Resolve the Split ............................................ 20 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................ 21
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John Carlson
Ridley McGreevy & Winocur
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jul 30 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jul 29 2026Reply of petitioner Dominic Miller filed. (Distributed)
- Jul 13 2026Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
- May 29 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 13, 2026.
- May 28 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 12, 2026 to July 13, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
- May 11 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 12, 2026.
- May 07 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 13, 2026 to June 12, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
- Apr 13 2026Response Requested. (Due May 13, 2026)
- Apr 02 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.
- Mar 27 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Mar 12 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2026)