Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Dominic Miller v. United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 25-1219 · judgment January 2, 2026


Pending

Question presented

Whether Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(b)(2)(E) requires a district court to personally invite a defendant to allocute before imposing a sentence following revocation of supervised release, such that complete denial of that opportunity constitutes plain error warranting resentencing. TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTION PRESENTED................................................................................................ ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ............................................................................................iii PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ..................................................................... 1 OPINIONS BELOW ......................................................................................................... 1 JURISDICTION ................................................................................................................. 1 STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND RULES INVOLVED ............................................ 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ......................................................................................... 3 REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION............................................................. 6 I. The Courts of Appeals Are Intractably Divided 5-3 on Whether Rule 32.1 Requires a Personal Invitation to Allocute ................................................................ 7 II. The Question Presented Is a Recurring Issue of National Importance Affecting Thousands of Federal Revocation Proceedings Annually................... 15 III. The Decision Below Conflicts with This Court’s Recognition of the Common-Law Right of Allocution in Green v. United States ................................ 17 IV. This Case Is an Ideal Vehicle to Resolve the Split ............................................ 20 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................ 21

Counsel of record

For petitioner
John Carlson
Ridley McGreevy & Winocur

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Jul 30 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
  2. Jul 29 2026
    Reply of petitioner Dominic Miller filed. (Distributed)
  3. Jul 13 2026
    Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
  4. May 29 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 13, 2026.
  5. May 28 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 12, 2026 to July 13, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
  6. May 11 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 12, 2026.
  7. May 07 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 13, 2026 to June 12, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
  8. Apr 13 2026
    Response Requested. (Due May 13, 2026)
  9. Apr 02 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.
  10. Mar 27 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
  11. Mar 12 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2026)