Eula Winfrey v. Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office

ARE DOCTORED GOVERMENTAL RECORDS LEGAL AND ADMISSABLE BY PATENT LAW? ARE FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS PERMISSABLE BY PATENT LAW? CAN AN APPLICATION CITED AS ' ABANDONED ' BE LAWFULLY ABANDONED WHEN THE APPLICANT IS DUTIFULLY AND CONSISTENTLY CURRENTLY WORKING FAITHFULLY UPON IT? HOW CAN AN ABANDONED' APPLICATION BE LEGALLY ABANDONED AND THE USPTO IS CONTINUING AFTERWARDS TO SEND CORRESPONDENCE WITH MADE UP OFFICE ACTIONS TO THE INVENTOR IN ORDER TO DECEIVE THEM INTO BELIEVING THAT THEIR APPLICATION IS STILL PENDING, WHEN RECORDS PROVE THAT THE INVENTOR'S APPLICATION HAS ALREADY BEEN GRANTED TO A MAJOR CORPORATION WITHOUT THE INVENTOR'S CONSENT OR KNOWLEDGE? THE INVENTOR HAS SENT THE RECEIPT TO SAID SECOND PATENT APPLICATION PROVING THAT THE USPTO REMOVED AND DENIED HER SIGNATURES ON BOTH HER PATENT APPLICATIONS DISALLOWING HER ACCESS TO HER OWN INVENTIONS. SHE HAS BEEN SENT THE ACTUAL RECEIPT OF THE USPTO'S PILLAGING OF HER INVENTION AND GIVEN TO ONE BY THE NAME OF 'DANIEL WALZMAN' ??? IS THE CONTINUAL REMOVING AND FALSIFYING OF THE INVENTOR'S SIGNATURES LAWFUL?? JOHN WEISS, THE INVENTOR'S FIRST EXAMINER CALLED THE INVENTOR WITH A CALL OF CONGRATULATIONS FOR A COMPLETED AND GRANTED PATENT APPLICATION AND A JOB WELL DONE. THE INVENTOR HAS SUBMITTED ACTUAL PROOF OF THIS CELEBRATORY PHONE CALL WITH A WITNESS AFIDAVIT. WILL THE COURT PLEASE PROCURE HER WITNESS DEPOSTION IMMEDIATELY? MRS. JOSEPHINE PERSONS 205 323 6205 PHONE