Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Robinson Peralta v. City of New York, New York, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 25-526 · judgment December 19, 2025
Question presented
Question 1 Whether a federal district court may deny relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3) without adjudicating properly raised allegations of fraud on the court that were presented before and after final judgment.. Question 2 Whether* the mandate rule and claim preclusion bar consideration of Rule 60(d)(3) allegations where no court has issued findings resolving those allegations on their merits including after Appeal No. 24-1356. Question 3 Whether the Due Process Clause requires that properly raised allegations challenging the integrity of the judicial process receive adjudication on the merits rather than being declined through finality doctrines
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Robinson Peralta
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 08 2026Petition for Rehearing filed.
- May 18 2026Petition DENIED.
- Apr 23 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/14/2026.
- Mar 04 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 13, 2026)