Kenneth Colvin, Jr. v. Russ Rurka, Warden

QUESTION 1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SHOULD HAD HEARD KENNETH COLVIN, JR.'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (RULE 60(d) MOTION) BASED ON FRAUD UPON THE COURT, AND NOT SENT THE MOTION TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AS A REQUEST FOR A SUCCESSIVE HABEAS CORPUS PETITION, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §2244 KENNETH COLVIN, JR. MOVANT-PETITIONER SAYS: "YES" QUESTION 2 THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SHOULD HAD TRANSFERRED KENNETH COLVIN, JR'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (RULE 60(d) MOTION) BACK TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT TO HAVE THAT COURT RE-OPEN HIS ORIGINAL HABEAS CORPUS CASE BASED 03 FRAUD UPON THE COURT KENNETH COLVIN, JR. MOVANT-PETITIONER SAYS: "YES"