Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ernest Mills v. Louisiana
IFP petition · Supreme Court of Louisiana, No. 2025-KP-00512 · judgment September 16, 2025
Questions presented
-
Whether U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 14 requires state prosecutors to disclose material exculpatory evidence to criminal defendants before the entry of a guilty plea, particularly when a defendant has filed a motion for discovery and Brady material before entry of the guilty plea?
-
Whether a Brady claim following a guilty plea is legally cognizable where the suppressed evidence was the cause without which the defendant would not have entered the guilty plea?
-
Whether the Due Process Clause requires disclosure of material exculpatory evidence to a defendant before entry of a guilty plea a question the Supreme Court left open in Ruiz but on which federal circuits have reached divergent outcomes, and which a Louisiana decision applied in a way that forecloses a claim based on a pre-plea discovery violation.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Ernest Mills
For respondent
Jorge Benjamin Aguinaga
Louisiana Department of Justice
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jun 25 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jun 25 2026Reply of petitioner Ernest Mills filed. (Distributed)
- Jun 10 2026Brief of respondent Louisiana in opposition filed.
- Apr 30 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 10, 2026.
- Apr 29 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 11, 2026 to June 10, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
- Apr 10 2026Response Requested. (Due May 11, 2026)
- Apr 02 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.
- Mar 30 2026Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
- Feb 23 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2026)