Larry Londra Walker v. Adam Douglas, Warden

PRESENTED ’•□ts XT AoTEVEN DeGATAGIE A*»w<6 RgASonAGIE TVRoRS THAT A CRIMINAL DEFENDANT HAs[No RTGHTj TC m ARE An TnFcR()ED VALUE JU0G-P1ENT TO ACWIT G-UTL.T To A lesser oFFE^SE I SVFpartTEO THE EVIDENCE TN HoRf^ , of avoioxmS A Potential HF6 SENTENCE ANO Counsel ooA^ OVERRIDE THAT OBJECTIVE And Force AN "All Oft. NoTMlN& 'STftATeG-^ u (&''■> FITS UnU/XILXNG <x.tgnT THERE Bv| Fb(?ev€R deprt.vx.n& the defendant of HTS oPPaftTWITj op GEInCJ doNVXcreO AnO SeNTENVED FOR THE lesser offense 9 Rule i*< -1 c«»r> I f (5 V€ rv-| C Czj <-y V -• tx£) VI fS j OiT F\ I >. f . ............ IM, Iiw I . IU,.iu |,„. » DESPTTG the case AnO c««nnoVEas^ ^MANDATE Fx«- r<^S!p“'-'cLen^- .to/- THE STATE l-T.C^<S CtM4<VTo/vn'^ Of Qj /Tq EixL»cHi'e< C'^'A C/cAr/H / Ck>ii ’/^ C\zn d_ ,^ 0^. I. •<_