Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Kurnicus Hayes v. Arnold Patrick

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 25-10641 · judgment October 30, 2025


Certiorari denied · May 4, 2026

Questions presented

In Gonzalez v. Crosby, this Court held that in order to obtain Rule 60(b)(6) relief extraordinary circumstances must be present. In determining whether extraordinary circumstances are present a court may consider a wide range of factors. These may include, in an appropriate case, “the risk of injustice to the parties” and “the risk of undermining the public’s confidence in the judicial process.” The questions presented are:

  1. Whether injustice outweighs the courts error and constitutes an extraordinary circumstance warranting relief under Rule 60(b)(6) catchall provision?

  2. Whether a state’s court procedural bar ruling that is not consistently applied to cases that are procedurally analogous, effectively suspends the petitioner’s right to access the Great Writ?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Kurnicus Hayes

For respondent
—

Case

Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Orders
Order list, May 4, 2026 · Certiorari denied
Order list, July 20, 2026 · Rehearing denied

Proceedings

  1. Jul 20 2026
    Rehearing DENIED.
  2. Jun 24 2026
    DISTRIBUTED.
  3. May 28 2026
    Petition for Rehearing filed.
  4. May 04 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  5. Apr 16 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2026.
  6. Feb 25 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 2, 2026)