Patricia M. Cornell v. Ann Cornell

Three questions. 1 .Patricia A. Cornell Trust. As a matter of law, did the Courts err when it denied Petitioner her Constitutional Due Process Rights in the Fourteenth Amendment and First Amendment Right of Freedom of Speech and Right to Petition, to have her rightful home in her mother’s Property? Did the courts err in failing to recognize the Settler's INTENT for the Beneficiary Petitioner’s right to an expressed gift with a mandatory commandment with use of the word: “Shall” of a Life Estate? Whether a Trustee can take away the rights of exclusive possession of the Property from a Beneficiary? Does the law still recognize unanswered conflicts regarding a Beneficiaries Right of Occupancy, and when a trustee has a right to sell the Property? As a matter of law, did the Court err in failing to recognize that a Court shall prove the validity of Extrinsic Evidence before allowing it in as Admissible Evidence, knowing full well drafting lawyers’ Testimony was False? There has been no unpublished case like this for over one hundred years. The Case: California Supreme Court: Le Breton v. Cook, (Le Breton) 107 Cal. 410 (1895).